Run git remote set-url --delete to delete the repository that is pushed to first, and then run git remote set-url --add to add it again so that it becomes the second push destination in the list. Is there a change in the refs in the underlying git on the server assuming you have server access? Does it show up on the Branches page? I am having great success with git push --mirror to make backup copies to a bare repo. The difference lays on whether you already have a working copy of that repository or not. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. In the above example this is not verified, so anyone can trigger a sync.
The difference is that when using --mirror, all refs are copied as-is. Making an exact duplicated repository In this case, you are duplicating your repository to a new location, and therefore you are having two duplicated but really independent repositories. How do I get the entire repo with all branches back again? This is awesome, since it makes it trivial to checkout out and work with them from your local repository, without having to add the submitter's repo as a remote all the time. For backups, I want to send an exact copy of that repository off to another server. Often times, you want to duplicate your git repository for redundancy or some other reasons. ? Mirror scripts We use the following script to do the actually mirroring. The -q option says to suppress normal output but keep error messages, which cron should send you by email if your server is properly configured.
To keep things organized, they're structured hierarchically. Any remote branches in the cloned remote and other refs are completely ignored. However, there is one case where it may have an undesired side effect: mirrors. Seeing the terminal output would help. GitHub and Gitorious allow you to push to them or pull from them, but you can not make them push to somewhere else. Same thing happens to tags. Is it sufficient to do this? Deleting branches There is one caveat: Deletion of branches is not mirrored, but deleted branches are resurrected by the mirror script.
May 21, 2013 Written by. Compared to --bare, --mirror not only maps local branches of the source to local branches of the target, it maps all refs including remote branches, notes etc. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. It will force the update if the remote history has diverged from the local one. If you pay attention to that list, tough, you may notice that you have a lot of branches that were already deleted in the upstream repository. It's supposed to be a functionally identical copy, interchangeable with the original.
Conclusion Git is certainly not an easy tool to learn. So it's usually best to use --mirror for one time copies, and just use normal push maybe with --all for normal uses. So in this case, including them in the mirror not only doubles the repository size, it also causes a corrupt git file system. There's no way to tell --mirror to ignore remote branches? To duplicate a repository without forking it, you can run a special clone command, then mirror-push to the new repository. As the docs originally said, it's a mirror. Think of just straight-up copying the repo, except in a much more elegant git way. I do not want to use git clone since I don't want my local repo to know about the bare repo.
There is nothing special with GitHub and Gitorious here. For example, if you want to duplicate to your local host, you can do this by e. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. This will now be out of date with the remote repository so a further push is necessary. However, what we want with mirroring is to replicate the state of an origin repository or upstream repository. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Otherwise, your pushes to that repository fail.
Git Howto: Mirror a GitHub repo without pull refs on GitHub recently started publishing all pull request as special git refs. Cleaning old references to remote branches By default, when you do a git fetch or git pull, git will not delete the references to branches that were deleted in the upstream repository you may view them in your. It seems to be re-pushing tracking branches. The result of fetching from an up-to-date mirror is the same as fetching directly from the initial repo. The following command is another way of pushing to the remote mirror repository. This technique would work exactly the same the other way around or with other servers. Is there a change in the refs in the underlying git on the server assuming you have server access? If you choose to use the older version of the console, you will find many of the concepts and basic procedures in this guide still apply.
Although when you do, it turns into a very powerful and flexible tool. The idea is really to mirror the repository, to have a total copy, so that you could for example host your central repo in multiple places, or back it up. But you do have references to remote branches. Now our GitHub repository also is a mirror. The new pretty much says all this: --mirror Set up a mirror of the source repository.
The reason you see something pushed the second time is that --mirror pushes a little more than you expect. I've seen this message too, and I think it's caused by a the tag already exists or b there are no branches pointing to the tag making the tag invisible to clients. Making it a complete 'mirror' of your local repository. Instead of using --mirror, push a single branch and see what happens. . More importantly, --mirror sets up the origin remote so that git fetch will directly fetch into local branches without doing any merge. Instead of using --mirror, push a single branch and see what happens.